General The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS) organised a one day seminar on “Measures to Attract and Retain Talent in the Indian Army” on Monday, 25 Aug 2008 at CLAWS seminar hall. The Keynote Address was delivered by Lt Gen Thomas Mathew, PVSM, AVSM, Adjutant General. The seminar was attended by a large number of serving officers and members of the strategic community. The seminar was chaired by Lt Gen Vijay Oberoi, PVSM, AVSM, VSM (Retd). The panelists included Lt Gen KR Rao, AVSM, VSM, DG MP & PS, Lt Gen HS Bagga, PVSM, AVSM (Retd) and Maj Gen Surjit Singh, AVSM, VSM (Retd).
While delivering the Keynote Address, the AG said that it is now realised by the government that addressing deficiencies in the army is not a problem only of the Army but it is now a national problem and needs to be addressed at the highest level. A large number of studies have been undertaken in the past to find a solution to this national problem. There has been some degree if success in the implementation of these studies. Yet there has been a steady decline in the intake and deficiencies have continued to rise since 2004. This can be attributed to the opening up of the economy and the resultant lucarative job market for young people in the corporate world. He said that, Army Headquarters has formulated a three-pronged strategy to address the deficiencies of officers in the lower ranks. This three-pronged approach consists mainly of in-house measures so that the service becomes more attractive. The salient points are:
At the end of the address, the AG said that while the above measures are under active consideration of the Ministry of Defence, he would welcome suggestions for further measures that need to be taken to improve the large deficiencies in the officer cadre of the Indian Army.
Lt Gen KR Rao, AVSM, VSM, DG MP & PS. While giving his presentation, the DG MP & PS brought out that despite savvy marketing strategies, the best MNCs today are facing challenges in attracting and retaining top quality talent. In fact, every Army in the world today is facing a talent crunch and wars in Iraq, Afghanistan have stretched the US, UK and EU armies to breaking point. To enlist one soldier, the US is contacting 120 young people today. He also highlighted the evolution of the officer cadre in the Indian Army from the Kings Commission in 1918 to the establishment of the Indian Military Academy in 1932 with 470 Indian officers passing out of IMA in 1939 as against 4000 British officers. Ever since then, the cadre strength has gone up. But the officer cadre has been deficient ever since independence as the size of the Indian Army has grown exponentially. He also highlighted the reasons for continued deficiency even despite large scale public relations campaigns as under: The career in the Army has become increasingly unpopular due to the fact that:
The deficiency in the officer cadre has led to ills such as lower morale and motivation, more burden on JCOs and NCOs who are not trained to lead and hence a decline in the officer-soldier ratio. This has resulted in lower organisational efficiency.
He brought out a futuristic cadre profile of intake where efforts would be made to popularise both regular intake and improve SSCO, SCO and PC (SL) entries in the Army. He said that while the intake to NDA would remain the same, it is proposed to reduce the intake of direct entries; ACC and UES from 640 to 110 a year. At the same time it is proposed to increase all SSCO, SCO, PC (SL) entries from the present 850 per year to 1600 per year. He further added that since the 10 + 2 Technical Entry Scheme has so far been the most popular hence it is proposed to increase the intake from this entry from 170 a year to 350 a year. He also added that to make the Short Service Commissioned Officer (SSCO) entry more popular there is a proposal to implement the following :
All the above proposals have been recommended by the AV Singh Committee as well. DGMP & PS gave further details of the methodology and refinements that will be carried out once the proposals are agreed to by the Ministry of Defence. Lt Gen HS Bagga During his presentation Lt Gen HS Bagga stressed that a career in the Army should not be taken as the sole career of one’s life. An army officer should be allowed to use this career as a stepping stone to move on to civilian life after having acquired the requisite skills to opt for a second career. He further added that the steepness of the pyramid for higher promotions has had a crippling effect on the attractiveness of the Army. He drew a comparison between Indian Army and Indian Police Service regarding cadre improvement from 1973 onwards. He said that while in 1973 the IPS had only one IGP in a state, who was equivalent to a Maj Gen, by 1996 all states had a DGP equivalent to an Army Commander and an additional DGP who is equivalent to a Lt Gen and the number of IGPs
Additional Vacancies
But so far only time scale promotions up to the rank of Lt Col and 750 additional vacancies for Colonels have been implemented. He summarised additional recommendations that need to be implemented:
Having been associated with the 4th and 5th Central Pay Commissions (CPC), Maj Gen Surjit Singh said that even after a review of the 6th CPC recommendations there are several anomalies. He highlighted that all scales have been created for civil services and the military has been inserted in as a ‘force fit’. The creation of the Pay Band 3 and Pay Band 4 is an apparent ploy to divide the officer cadre into two classes. The other anomalies that were brought out are: Stipend for officer cadets has not been given while civil service probationers are paid from the day their training starts. Even their seniority for service commences on the same day whereas for officers it starts on the day of commission which is four years after a cadet joins NDA. The officer cadre should be in the highest pay band and not two distinct categories. However, the civil servants have been able to convince the government that if a Brigadier gets more pay than a joint secy (if number of years of service is taken as a criterion of pay) then civil control over the military will be diluted. He brought out that since only 40% of the arrears are to be admitted in this financial year, detailed instructions should only be issued when all outstanding issues have been fully resolved. If anomalies can be resolved at a later stage, then anomalies can also be forestalled. A good pay structure should aim at equity and should not be one that leads to a sense of bitterness or a feeling of inequity. He also laid stress on some non-pecuniary irritants that are detrimental to firstly attracting and then retaining talent in the Army. These are :-
He made the following recommendations:-
The following aspects emerged during the discussion :
Conclusion The discussion and presentations were well received by all present. The seminar raised a number of positive suggestions that can be implemented to attract and retain talent in the Army. |
Share |