Key Note Address by the Hon'ble Raksha Mantri Good Morning, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am privileged to be present here today amongst you all at the National Seminar on Defence Cooperation as a tool for enhancing National Interest. •The most visible manifestation of a strategic relationship between two countries is cooperation in the sphere of defence. Strong political and economic ties between two countries can be further enhanced through closer defence cooperation, provided the potential challenges are identified and addressed and there is clarity on its terminal benefits. Most countries build defence relationships that promote specific national security interests, develop friendly military capabilities for building mutual confidence and trust as also to imbibe ‘best practices’ for various aspects of defence functioning. Defence cooperation also leads to optimizing action in the field of UN peacekeeping as well as disaster management. Chief -of -the- Army-Staff address at the Seminar Hon’ble Raksha Mantri, Esteemed Guests, members of the media, Ladies & Gentlemen, •It is indeed a privilege to welcome you all to the National Seminar on Defence Cooperation, which is being organised by Centre for Land Warfare Studies, the Army’s ‘think tank’. At the outset, I express my gratitude to the Honourable Raksha Mantri to have taken time off from his busy schedule to grace this occasion and deliver the key note address as also release the inaugural issue of the CLAWS journal. Jai Hind. Seminar Report
General The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS) organised a one day seminar on “Defence Cooperation as a Tool for Enhancing National Interest” on 18 Feb 2008. The inaugural address was delivered by the Gen Deepak Kapoor, PVSM, AVSM, SM, VSM, COAS. The keynote address was delivered by Shri A K Antony, the Hon’ble Raksha Mantri. The seminar had two plenary sessions. The first plenary session was chaired by Gen Shankar Roychowdhury, PVSM, former COAS. Maj Gen AK Singh, SM, VSM, ADG PP, Lt Gen VK Kapoor (Retd) and Lt Gen VG Patankar, (Retd) analysed defence cooperation under an Indian perspective with emphasis on the Indo-US and Indo-Russian defence cooperation. In the second plenary session, chaired by Ambassador G Parthasarthy, Former High Commissioner to Pakistan, Lt Gen Vijay Oberoi, PVSM, AVSM, VSM, (Retd), former VCOAS, Rear Admiral Pradeep Chauhan, AVSM, VSM, ACNS (FCI), IHQ of MoD (Navy) and Mr Vivek Katju, Additional Secretary (Political & International Organisations), Ministry of External Affairs deliberated on a road map for the future of defence cooperation in India. Objectives of the Seminar The objectives of the seminar were: (a) To examine the present status of defence cooperation in India and take stock of what has been achieved over the past four decades. (b) To evolve a vision for future defence cooperation in India so that emerging national challenges and concerns are addressed through this medium of diplomacy. Session I: Inaugural Session Both the COAS and the Hon’ble Raksha Mantri highlighted the importance of defence cooperation in India’s overall strategy in dealing with the emerging security situation in the country’s immediate and extended neighbourhood. The COAS brought out that India has a good track record of military to military exchanges with friendly foreign countries. This has resulted in bolstering confidence amongst our military and other armies with regard to inter-operability of equipment and other resources. India’s large contribution to UN peace keeping operations over the past few decades has also contributed towards further improving military ties with a large number of countries. However, much more can still be done in the field of defence cooperation to further advance India’s national interests and foreign policy objectives. The Hon’ble Raksha Mantri brought out that globalisation has affected defence as much as any other activity and there is a need to continually find avenues for exchanging points of view with colleagues overseas, as well as learning from successful innovations being implemented elsewhere. India has wide ranging interests in international defence and military cooperation. It has been used as an effective tool of foreign policy and is one of the main forms of engagement with many countries such as Bhutan, China, France, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Mauritius, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, the United Kingdom and USA. Military to military contacts are particularly vibrant and dynamic with countries like Bhutan, Nepal and USA. Defence cooperation can play a key role in regional and global security and it must be further enhanced with countries in the region so that bilateral and multilateral ties can be improved even further. Session II: Defence Cooperation – An Indian Perspective The speakers highlighted areas of concern and also brought out the relevance of continued defence cooperation with Russia and on further enhancing the levels of defence cooperation with the US. The salient aspects and issues articulated/discussed during the session are in succeeding paras: Overview (a) There has been a paradigm shift in the Indian approach to defence cooperation since 2001 that has resulted in exponential increase in international defence cooperation both in range and levels of activity. (b) Defence cooperation in technology is gradually moving away from a buyer–seller relationship to joint development / production. (c) The present defence cooperation engagement is, however, based on individual service / organisation’s perception and needs. (d) Defence Wings from 51 countries are presently represented in India whereas our representation is only in 37 countries. Our own representation needs to be enhanced.
On June 28, 2005 India and the US agreed on a ‘New Framework for Indo-US Defence Relations’ which included the following: (a) Conduct joint and combined exercises and exchanges. (b) Collaborate in multinational operations when it is in the common interest of both countries. (c) Strengthen the capabilities of both militaries to promote security and defeat terrorism. (d) Expand interaction with other nations in ways that promote regional and global peace and stability. (e) Enhance capabilities to combat proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. (f) Increase opportunity for technology transfer, collaboration, co-production and research and development. (g) Expand collaboration relating to missile defence. (h) Strengthen the abilities of both militaries to respond quickly to disaster situations, including in combined operations. (j) Assist in building worldwide capacity to conduct successful peacekeeping operations. (k) Conduct exchanges on defence strategy and transformation. (l) Increase exchanges of intelligence. (m) Continue strategic level discussions by senior leadership from the US Department of Defence and India’s Ministry of Defence. Indo-Russian Defence Cooperation (a) India and Russia have had close and friendly relations for nearly six decades. About 70 per cent of India’s weapons and equipment are from Russia. (b) Military-technical cooperation has been an important part of this relationship between India and Russia. However, the Indian defence industry has not benefited from this cooperation, as there was little by way of technology transfer. (c) Some suggestions that were made to further extend Indo-Russian military technical cooperation are as follows: - (i) Military-technical cooperation should be expanded to a broader level of defence cooperation including transfer of technology. (ii) Facilitation for direct interaction between OEM and buyers (military services). (iii) Involvement of Indian public and private sector industries in the development and production of military equipment and systems. (iv) Development of doctrine, particularly to deal with common threats like terrorism. (v) Consultations for formulation of policy options for the situation in Central and West Asia. (vi) Cooperation in space and information technology as essential ingredients of security. Session III : Road Map for the Future The salient aspects and issues articulated/discussed during the session are briefly highlighted in succeeding paras. Defence Cooperation with Neighbours including CARs The following recommendations were made: (a) Pakistan (i) Defence cooperation with Pakistan still remains a distant dream. (ii) India should continue engaging the Pakistani military as the military continues to be all powerful. (iii) The two countries should continue to cooperate on disaster relief operations along the borders. (i) Engagements with China should continue and shall be further enhanced. ii) China respects power and hence there should be no policy of appeasement. iii) India should project both its ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ power when dealing with China. (c) Bhutan (i) India and Bhutan share excellent relations, especially at the military level. ii) IMTRAT and Border Roads are great assets that India must continue to utilise to foster better ties with India. (iii) Close relationship between India and Bhutan must continue. (d) Nepal (i) Military relations between India and Nepal were sustained even when there were strains in other fields. (ii) The Indian Army training team in Nepal was wound up many years ago. This must be revived so that better military to military contacts can be achieved. (iii) The tradition of conferring honorary generalship on respective Chiefs must also continue. (e) Bangladesh (i) Bangladesh is geographically encircled by India. There is a need for reassurance by India that India has no designs of invading that country. (ii) Military to military relations are normal and routine. There is a need to enhance this as a confidence building measure. (f) Myanmar (i) Military to military relations between India and Myanmar are good. Besides training, there is co-operation in border operations against insurgents and road construction by Border Roads Organisation. (ii) There is a need to expand training assistance and offer weapons and equipment to offset or reduce the influence of China on Myanmar. (g) Sri Lanka (i) Military to military relations continue to be strong. (ii) There is need to restore Sri Lanka’s confidence in India so that closer ties can be fostered and to wean away Sri Lanka from Diversifying its arms purchases to countries like Pakistan and Chine. (h) Iran (i) India and Iran have insufficient military to military relations presently. (ii) India needs to increase defence co-operation to counter the influence of China. (i) Afghanistan (i) Uncertainties continue in Afghanistan. The writ of the government prevails only in a few areas. (ii) The best military help that can be given is to train, arm and equip a portion of the Afghan Army. (j) Central Asian Republics (CARs) (i) Expand foothold in Ayani airbase in Tajikistan with a permanent presence, including of a joint rapid reaction force, trained for peace-keeping and related roles. (ii) Setting up of a multi-discipline academically-oriented facility at Tashkent in Uzbekistan, on the lines of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Security Studies at Honolulu in Hawaii was recommended. (k) South East Asia (i) South East Asian countries are wary of increasing military capability of China. India can provide a viable alternative to counter-balance China. (ii) Military to military relations are at a high level. There is a need for these relations to be sustained, especially in the maritime environment. (a) The primary area of Indian maritime interest ranges from the Persian Gulf in the North, to Antarctica in the South, and, from the Cape of Good Hope and the East coast of Africa in the West to the Strait of Malacca and the landmasses of Malaysia and Indonesia in the East. (b) As the geographic competition-space between India and China coincides in the Indian Ocean, wisdom and forbearance are going to be needed in generous measure so that competition does not transform into conflict. (c) There is a need to enhance the following: (i) Generation of interoperability amongst navies of the region. (ii) Enhancement of ‘maritime domain awareness’ through a variety of information-sharing mechanisms. Deductions and Recommendations (a) Defence diplomacy is a potent instrument for promoting national interests. (b) In recent years, Indian military has shed its hesitant approach, but endeavours are still essentially in the fields of training and visits. (c) Co-opting the military leadership in strategic dialogues and consultative processes is essential. (d) Defence diplomacy, as a strategic tool for engagement should be conducted both at bilateral and multi-lateral levels. (e) As India grows in stature, it will need to utilise defence diplomacy to the fullest extent to enhance its national interests. (f) There is a need for appropriate structures and organisations to use this important strategic tool. Conclusion The general consensus at the end of the seminar was that the overall vision and aim of India’s defence cooperation needs to be clearly defined. So far defence cooperation has only been restricted to platoon or company level interaction. It also emerged that there was little follow up on reports that were submitted consequent to visits by Indian military delegations abroad. There is a need to evolve systems and mechanisms for joint consultations with the Ministry of External Affairs, the Ministry of Defence and the Chiefs of Staffs of the armed forces while formulating a comprehensive national strategy with regard to defence cooperation. |
Share |